JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 25, 2014

A- de 2014

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Sala De Seguimiento·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Auto De Seguimiento A Sentencia En Materia De Desplazamiento Forzado
  • Solicitud de copias de los informes enviados a la Corte Constitucional por la UARIV y el Director de la Unidad Nacional de Protección, en cumplimiento a la orden primera del auto 027 de
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se autoriza a los peticionarios la expedición de copias de los informes allegados a la Sala Especial de Seguimiento por la Directora de la Unidad Administrativa Especial para la Atención y Reparación Integral a las Víctimas y el Director de la Unidad Nacional de Protección, en cumplimiento a la orden primera del auto 027 de 2013.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. EXPIDASE, a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, copia de los informes allegados a esta Sala Especial de Seguimiento por la Directora de la Unidad Administrativa Especial para la Atencion y Reparacion Integral a las Victimas (UARIV) y el Director de la Unidad Nacional de Proteccion, en cumplimiento a la orden primera del auto 027 de 2013, a costa de los interesados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.